Lichen, Lichen, Everywhere
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e63f9/e63f959972d1f67332ba1bd560a65c2032d8016f" alt=""
Whoever came up with these names obviously knew their lichens. For those of us who grew up in the city, lichen is about as greek as it gets. What in the world is this lichen thing, and why does it look so different?? So for those of you in the same boat, here's what I've learned:
Lichen is a cominbation of two organisms - a fungus and an algae. The latter produces food for the fungus via photoxynthesis, and the fungus provides the algae with minerals and water absorbed from the base they grow on (tree, soil, rock, etc). Most of the lichen's bulk is made up of fungus, and the shape of the lichen is usually determined by the fungal partner. Since they have little control over the amount of water in their environment, lichens are "poikilohydric," which means they can tolerate and survive through long periods with no water. As such, they can be found in more extreme environments where other plant forms may not be able to survive.
Lichen have different jobs as part of the environment. When they
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f833e/f833eee64ac15a06dc71222a60d4a8ade601ca6d" alt=""
So how come all these diagnoses look different but contain the name "lichen?" Turns out lichen differ greatly in what they look like and are classified into categories based on appearance: crustose (flat, paint-like), filamentose (hair-like), foliose (leafy), fruticose (branched), leprose (powdery), squamulose (scale-like), gelatinous. Who woulda thunk?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home